MaxStocker.com   MaxStocker.com    
   
Home About Blog Stuff Contact
 
   
 

November 2008

Aaarrrrrrghhhhh
Posted : Sat November 29th

More bang for the buck
Posted : Fri November 28th

Throttling updated but not concluded
Posted : Tue November 25th

Improved RSS Feed
Posted : Thu November 20th

Any less spam for you?
Posted : Wed November 19th

Canada Post on Strike
Posted : Mon November 17th

A new word
Posted : Thu November 13th

From Possible to Practical
Posted : Wed November 12th

Utterly Hopeless
Posted : Mon November 10th

JDBC Connection Errors Checklist
Posted : Wed November 5th

When a deal isn't a deal
Posted : Mon November 3rd

Yikes
Posted : Tue October 28th

Things that would be nice that won't happen
Posted : Sat October 25th

Decision on internet throttling delayed
Posted : Fri October 24th

Recent Comments

Max in Whose blog is it anyway?
on Mon May 10th

Rob in Whose blog is it anyway?
on Fri May 7th

Anonymous in SEO and the magic beans
on Thu April 8th

Max in SEO and the magic beans
on Thu April 8th

n.o. in SEO and the magic beans
on Thu April 8th

silky in Right way, wrong way
on Fri February 19th

Categories

Technical
69 Entries

Security
18 Entries

Java
23 Entries

Privacy
6 Entries

Database
11 Entries

Internet
58 Entries

Business
31 Entries

Site Updates
19 Entries

Personal
86 Entries

RSS Feed RSS Feed

Tag Cloud

Throttling updated but not concluded
Posted : Tuesday November 25th, 2008

So last week the CRTC finally rules on the "packet shaping" or "throttling" being performed by Bell. At face the CRTC said that Bell wasn't breaking any laws but it's a decision that's left a fair degree of confusion in it's wake.

Bell claimed the decision as a victory but the CRTC then disagreed. Basically the CRTC spin is that while packet shaping may not be illegal it's not "correct" from an ethical or ideal perspective either.

I become more convinced with time that my idea of spinning off the network itself into a crown-corporation is a really good one. I think the bottom line concern, even for the smaller ISPs that filed the original complaint and are voicing outrage over the ruling, is not so much that throttling is happening at all but in the conflict of interest since Bell also acts as an ISP directly to customers. If the network is saturated who do you think will be the first group to be throttled? Bell's customers or someone elses? I think that's a question that we all know the answer too.

So now the next step of the process is moving on. The CRTC is collecting more information and will make some sort of ruling/plan supposedly in February. I say supposedly because they were two months behind (of a 6 month schedule) in issuing the ruling they have so far so it seems likely we could be waiting till next May to actually get the final result.

I'd like to add a point that if you read this and don't know what I am talking about or why it applies to you. Well. If you live in Canada this is pretty important stuff. The final rulings on this will affect alot of things including, the amount of competition for internet services in Canada, the price you pay, the quality of service and the responsibility for long-term upgrades and capacity planning. In many ways as far as Canada goes this ruling will go a long way to determining the future course of the internet and internet business in Canada. So yeah, it's important.

Tags

Bell  CRTC  ISP  packet  shaping  throttling 

Categories

Internet 

Comments

 
   
  Follow me on Twitter   My Facebook Profile   My LinkedIn Profile   RSS feed of my blog Home   |   About   |   Blog   |   Stuff   |   Contact   |   Privacy Policy  
   
  © 2008 Max Stocker